论文部分内容阅读
目的:了解在“双轨合一”临床医学专业硕士培养体系下，科研水平处于中等的省级教学医院，临床专硕目前面临的科研现状。方法:通过对一所省级教学医院所有在读的3个年级医学硕士研究生，采用“问卷星”网络调查的方式对科研相关的认知、现状、自我评价进行全方位调查，并分别对专硕和学硕的科研现状进行对比分析。结果:学硕参与科研课题的比率要高于专硕，专硕研究生即使到三年级参与科研课题的比例仍然不高。而科研论文发表情况，学硕与专硕差异无统计学意义。学硕对科研知识的掌握状况要高于专硕。虽然学硕受到导师的科研指导相对较多，但是专硕与导师的沟通增加，并且调查显示专硕对导师、院校研究生政策和科研政策的满意度均要高于学硕，差异有统计学意义。此外，对研究生的自我科研压力调查发现，学硕和专硕的科研压力程度都超过了50%。结论:学硕由于专业特点及受到导师的科研指导更多，其对科研知识的掌握状况明显优于专硕。但是近年来基于科研课题管理的专硕培养模式改革，已经使得专硕生与导师交流更多，对导师、院校的满意度显著增加。另外，医学研究生的科研压力需要引起足够的重视。“,”Objective:To understand the current research status of master of professional degree students in clinical medicine in provincial teaching hospitals with moderate scientific research level under the “ dual-track” training system.Methods:Sojump online survey was conducted to investigate the cognition, current situation and self-evaluation of all clinical master degree students in three grades in a provincial teaching hospital, and the research status of professional degree and scientific degree students was compared and analyzed respectively.Results:The proportion of scientific degree students participating in scientific research projects was significantly higher than that of professional degree students. The proportion of professional degree students participating in scientific research projects was still not high even in the third year of graduate students. However, there was no difference between scientific degree and professional degree students in the publication of scientific research papers. The scientific degree of scientific research knowledge is significantly higher than that of professional degree students. Although scientific degree students receive more scientific research guidance from their supervisors, professional degree students communicate more with their supervisors, and the results show that professional degree students are significantly more satisfied with their supervisors, graduate policies and scientific research policies than scientific degree students. In addition, the results of graduate students found that the degree of research stress of both scientific and professional degrees exceeded 50%.Conclusions:Scientific degree is better than professional degree in research status because of professional characteristics and more research guidance from their supervisors. However, through the reform of professional degree training mode based on scientific research project management in recent years, professional degree students have been able to communicate more with their supervisors, and their satisfaction with their supervisors and colleges has significantly increased. In addition, sufficient attention should be paid to high scientific research pressure of medical graduate students.