论文部分内容阅读
一、中国的审判监督、内国仲裁监督与涉外仲裁监督的同异及其待决问题二、中国两类仲裁监督分别立法之合理性的商榷(一)中国《仲裁法》的涉外仲裁监督规定与《民事诉讼法》有关规定的接轨问题(二)中国《仲裁法》的涉外仲裁监督规定与国际条约有关规定的接轨问题(三)中国《仲裁法》的涉外仲裁监督规定与当代各国仲裁立法通例有关规定的接轨问题(四)中国涉外仲裁监督问题的“特殊性”及其有关机制与国际条约、国际惯例接轨的必要性
I. The Similarities and Differences of the Trial Supervision, the Domestic Arbitration Supervision and the Foreign-related Arbitration Supervision and the Pending Problems 2. The Arguments about the Rationality of the Two Types of China’s Arbitration and Supervision Legislation 1. The Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China on Arbitration and Supervision of Foreign Arbitration (2) The Connection of Foreign Arbitration Supervision Provisions in China’s Arbitration Law with the Relevant Provisions of International Treaties (III) The Provisions Concerning the Supervision of Foreign Arbitration in China’s Arbitration Law and the Legislation of Arbitration in Contemporary Countries (4) The “Particularity” of China’s Arbitration and Supervision over Foreign Matters and the Necessity of Relevant Mechanisms with the International Treaties and International Practices