应当像刘庆住先生主张的那样,解释瓦当图案的含义,只能用考古学手段把它“回溯”到具体的建筑遗址所处的历史时代与相关环境中去分析研究。文字瓦当相对图案瓦当,当面装饰的含义就比较“一目了然”了,因为文字是图案的进一步升华。文字瓦当出现的时代,以焦南峰为代表的观点认为,战国时代的秦国已经出现,例证是雍城秦统一前后的地层中考古发掘出土了“蕲年宫当”、“橐泉宫当”、“来谷宫当”和“竹泉宫当”等一批瓦当,他们还断定包括“华市”瓦当在内的几件当面似图似文的秦瓦当上的部分图案为文字。而以刘庆柱为代表的观点认为文字瓦当出现于汉景帝时期,普及于汉武帝时期,西汉中晚期达到鼎盛 It should be interpreted as the meaning of the Vatan motif, as Mr. Liu Qingzhuo advocated, and can only be “traced back” to the historic times and related circumstances in the specific architectural site by means of archeology. Text tile when the relative pattern tile, the meaning of face decoration is more “at a glance ”, because the text is the further sublimation of the pattern. As the representative of Jiao Nanfeng holds the view that the Qin Kingdom in the Warring States Period has emerged as an example of the unearthed archaeological excavations in the strata before and after the unification of Yongcheng and Qin, They also concluded that several pieces of face-to-face text like Qin Hua, including the Wazhou palace, Part of the pattern on the tile is text. While Liu Qingzhu represented the view that the text watt when appeared in the Han Jingdian period, popularized in the Han Emperor Wu, reached the peak in the late Western Han Dynasty