论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较开张式双垫在治疗磨牙症中与塑料垫的临床疗效。方法:分别用自制的开张式双垫与塑料牙合垫对48例磨牙症患者进行治疗,随访9个月。统计治疗结束1个月和9个月时的停止磨牙病例和平均减少的磨牙时间。结果:戴用1个月停止磨牙病例数比为6:12,戴用9个月时停止磨牙病例数比为10:21。其差异具有显著性(P<0.01)。结论:开张式双垫治疗磨牙症优于塑料垫。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of open double pad in the treatment of bruxism with plastic pad. Methods: Forty-eight patients with bruxism were treated with a self-made open double pad and a plastic occlusal pad. The patients were followed up for 9 months. The number of molars stopped and the average reduction of molars at 1 month and 9 months after the end of treatment were calculated. RESULTS: The number of molars to be stopped at 1 month was 6:12, and the number of molars stopped at 9 months was 10:21. The difference was significant (P <0.01). Conclusions: Opened double pad treatment of bruxism is superior to plastic pad.