一、大变局时代的宪政变迁宪政史研究以文本为中心,这似乎是个惯常做法。之所以如此,可能一方面是为了宪政史书写的便利,另一方面也是宪政史研究之法学立场的凸显。但很大程度上,宪政史考察的是激变时代的宪政变迁,用阿克曼的说法,就是更接近于“宪法政治”时代,而非常规政治时代,具体的宪政变迁之复杂性可能远远超过按部就班的宪政文本排列中所呈现的格局。以清末民初为例,就宪政文本而言, First, the vicissitudes of constitutional changes in the era of constitutional history research to text as the center, it seems to be a common practice. The reason for this may be that on the one hand, the convenience of writing the constitutional history, on the other hand, it is also the highlight of the jurisprudence of the constitutional history research. To a large extent, however, the constitutional history examines the constitutional changes in the era of radical changes. In Ackerman’s terms, it is closer to the “constitutional politics” era than to the conventional political era. The complexity of the concrete constitutional changes may Far more than the orderly arrangement of the constitutional text presented in the pattern. In the late Qing dynasty and early Republic of China, for example, in terms of constitutional texts,