本文认为，“编辑学者化”这一口号的提出，无论是就其所针对的问题，还是所倡导的改进方向，都是有积极意义的。但是，由于口号本身在表述上的逻辑困扰和理解上的意义分歧，使其在实践中易于出现溢出编辑专业本份的偏颇。因此，作者建议应该更多地从编辑的职业定位和职责范围去考虑问题，从编辑的专业话语范畴去讨论问题，从对大多数编辑的普遍要求去界定问题，尽可能地不作超出职业领域的意义理解和学术定位，以避免和减少实践上的误导和偏颇。事实上，在当下的环境中，提倡“编辑的专业化”有着更明确的职业规定性和更迫切的需求 This paper argues that the slogan of “edifying a scholarly person” is of positive significance both in terms of the issue it is addressing and in the direction of improvement it advocates. However, due to its slogan of logical expression and disagreement in understanding, the slogan is prone to be biased in practice in spite of overflowing the editing professional. Therefore, the author suggests that more consideration should be given to the editors’ career orientation and terms of reference, the issues to be discussed from the scope of editorial discourse, the definition of problems from the prevailing requirements of most editors, and the possibility of being beyond the profession as much as possible Meaning understanding and academic orientation, in order to avoid and reduce the practical misleading and biased. In fact, advocating “editorial specialization” in the current environment has more specific job rules and more pressing needs