论文部分内容阅读
美国法院附设调解是当事人之间运用协商方式在中立第三人(调解人)的帮助下达成和解的纠纷解决方式,它可分为“强制性”和“自愿性”两种类型。我国法院调解制度与美、日法院附设调解制度存在本质上的区别。我们应当从赋予当事人程序选择权;建立前置性调解程序;遵循自愿、合法与效率的原则;赋予调解协议的法律效力等多方面来完善我国法院调解制度。
Mediation in the United States courts is a way of settling disputes between parties through reconciliation with the help of a neutral third party (mediator) through negotiation. It can be divided into two types: “mandatory” and “voluntary”. There is an essential difference between our country’s court mediation system and the conciliation system annexed by the United States and Japan. We should improve the court mediation system in our country from many aspects, such as giving the parties procedural options, establishing the pre-mediation procedure, following the principles of voluntariness, lawfulness and efficiency, and giving the legal effect of the mediation agreement.