研究文学史常常会遇到这样的尴尬：当一个学者面对一个时代千姿百态难以归类的文学形态时，势必要动用逻辑武器对它进行必要的归类；研究者往往倾向于把不同形态的文学之间的共同点，想象到与他的逻辑框架相适应的程度。我想，我们不必由此就悲观地认为文学史是不可研究的... It is often embarrassing to study the history of literature: when a scholar confronts an unpredictable literary form of a variety of times, it is bound to use logical weapons to classify it as necessary. Researchers tend to treat different forms of literature The common ground between them, imagining the extent to which his logical framework fits. I think we do not have to pessimistically think that the history of literature is not to be studied ...