论文部分内容阅读
上期,我们组织初一师生到木子铺生产队上作文课,让学生以该队贫下中农抓大事、学大寨的先进事迹为题材写通讯报道。文章写成后,选印了其中一篇比较好的《大寨花开木子铺》,送请贫下中农评改验收。这时,有的教师认为:“贫下中农文化水平低,要他们评改作文,是给他们出难题。”还有的说:“我们改过的文章,自己都提不出什么意见来了,贫下中农还能提出什么意见?”贫下中农究竟能不能评改作文,学校党支部组织师生再下木子铺,让事实作出回答。
In the previous period, we organized the first teachers and students to take classes in the production team of the Muzipu production team to allow students to write newsletters based on the advanced deeds of the team’s poor and middle-aged farmers. After the article was written, one of the better “Dazhai Huakai Muzipu” was printed and sent to the poor and middle-aged farmers for review and acceptance. At this time, some teachers believe that: “The poor under-cultivated middle-level culture is low, and it is difficult for them to judge the composition of the composition.” Another said: “Of the articles we have turned over, we have no suggestions whatsoever. What kind of opinions can be put forward?” Can the poor and middle-aged peasants interpret the essay? The school party branch organizes the teachers and students to lay down the woods again and lets the facts answer.