论文部分内容阅读
目的 比较连续加速超分割 (CAHF)和后程加速超分割 (LCAF)放射治疗食管癌对食管癌患者长期生存质量的影响。方法 运用食管癌放射治疗后常见晚期放射治疗反应主客观处理分析(SOMA)量表、症状自评量表 (SCL 90 )和生活满意度指数A表 (LSI A)综合评定 2个组食管癌放射治疗后生存满 3年患者的生活质量包括躯体功能状况、精神心理状态及自我生活满意度情况。结果 CAHF和LCAF组食管癌长期生存者常见晚期放射反应、SCL 90评分和LSI A指数无显著差别。结论 (1)运用量表形式评定食管癌放射治疗后生活质量方法可行 ;(2 )初步研究显示CAHF与LCAF方案对食管癌患者长期生活质量影响无显著差别 ;(3)食管癌患者长期生活质量的评价方法尚需进一步摸索 ,并需扩大病例数及建立对照样本
Objective To compare the effects of continuous accelerated superfractionation (CAHF) and late accelerated hyperfractionation (LCAF) radiation on esophageal cancer on the long-term quality of life of esophageal cancer patients. Methods The SOMA, SCL 90 and LSI A scores of esophageal cancer radiotherapy after esophageal cancer radiotherapy were used to evaluate the radiotherapy of esophageal cancer The quality of life of patients who survived 3 years after treatment included physical function status, mental status and self-satisfaction. Results The long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients with CAHF and LCAF group was associated with late radiation reaction. There was no significant difference between SCL 90 score and LSI A index. Conclusion (1) It is feasible to evaluate the quality of life of esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy with the form of scale. (2) Preliminary studies have shown no significant difference between long-term quality of life of esophageal cancer patients with CAHF and LCAF regimens; (3) The evaluation method needs to be further explored, and the need to expand the number of cases and the establishment of a control sample