论文部分内容阅读
自从毛主席在最高國务会議上宣布科学工作要实行百家爭鳴的方針以后,整个学術界都感到欢欣鼓舞,都要为貫徹这个方針而稍极貢献出最大力量。从教育科学上看为什么必須貫徹这个方針?怎样貫徹这个方針?很需要談談。現在先提出我們初步的意見。从教育科学上看为什么必须贯做百家爭鳴的方針呢?因为教育学还是很幼稚的科学,其中有很多矛盾和問題,不经过群策群力的討論,就不可能促進这一科学發展。近三十多年來,苏联在教育科学上就是从不断的討論和斗爭当中獲得巨大的發展的。苏联建國初期的教育工作,就經过很多的試驗和討論。到了1931年曾总結批判了过去許多不適当的做法,如統一劳动学校,九年制学校的高年級职業化以及按照生活主題來編教材的綜合教学等等;同时肯定了班級教学为教学中
Since Chairman Mao announced at the highest State Council meeting that the scientific work must implement the principle of a hundred schools of thought, the entire academic community is encouraged and encouraged, and it must contribute a great deal to the implementation of this policy. From the perspective of educational science, why must we implement this principle? How to implement this policy? It is necessary to talk about it. Let us first present our preliminary comments. From the perspective of educational science, why must we pursue the policy of contending with one another? Because pedagogy is still very naive science, and there are many contradictions and problems. Without scientific discussion, it is impossible to promote this scientific development. In the past thirty years or so, the Soviet Union has achieved great development in education science from constant discussions and struggles. The education of the Soviet Union at the beginning of its founding was subject to many trials and discussions. By 1931, he had summed up and criticized many inappropriate practices in the past, such as uniform labor schools, senior professionalization of nine-year schools, and comprehensive teaching of textbooks based on life themes. At the same time, he affirmed class teaching as teaching. in