论文部分内容阅读
学术期刊的学术评价功能依赖于学术共同体,所谓的学术共同体指的是拥有某种共同的学术范式、旨趣的学术同仁(学派)。到目前为止,中国还没有形成真正意义上的学派,缺乏共识,形成学术共同体的条件和群体意识还不完全具备。学术共同体的缺失是学术期刊之学术评价功能异化的重要原因:原初的、根本性的学术传播功能被忽视,而后来演化出来的学术评价功能则备受关注。就当下中国的学术评价与期刊评价问题而言,最关键的是学术共同体的缺失以及如何建构的问题。这需要在引进SSCI时对其进行消化吸收和转化,同时结合中国国情建构学术共同体,以形成具有中国特色的学术评价体系。此外,在建构学术共同体与进行学术评价的过程中,要注意为个性化的创新留下足够的空间,要发挥综合性期刊适应多学科、综合性研究的优势,要关注学术的民族性问题。
Academic evaluation of academic journals rely on the academic community, the so-called academic community refers to have a common academic paradigm, the purpose of academic colleagues (school). So far, China has not yet formed a true school of thought, lacked a consensus, and the conditions for forming an academic community and group awareness are not yet fully met. The lack of academic community is an important reason for the academic evaluation of academic journals: the original and fundamental function of academic communication is neglected, and the academic evaluation function evolved later is of great concern. At present, China’s academic evaluation and journal evaluation issues, the key is the lack of academic community and how to construct the problem. This needs to be digested and transformed when SSCI is introduced. At the same time, the academic community should be constructed according to China’s national conditions so as to form an academic evaluation system with Chinese characteristics. In addition, in the process of constructing academic community and conducting academic evaluation, we should pay attention to leaving enough space for personalized innovation. We should give full play to the advantage of comprehensive journals to adapt to multidisciplinary and comprehensive research, and pay attention to academic nationality issues.