论文部分内容阅读
“文学史重写”主要表现在文学史观层面的调整,又通常存在着历史观念与现实制约、逻辑建构与具体史实、框架结构与材料选择不相协调的矛盾,而“文学生活史”的介入,不失为文学史写作范式的一种选择。作为一种文学史的“文学生活史”命题的提出及其范式的转换,又至少包含三个既独立又融合的层面:一是以普通读者为中心的主体性选择,二是以日常生活为基础的价值性判断,三是以社会反应为参照的动态性描述,从而达成“对话性”文学史的写作,进而重建文学与生活的关系意义。
“Literary history rewriting ” is mainly manifested in the adjustment of the literary history concept, and often there is a contradiction between historical concepts and realistic constraints, logical construction and concrete historical facts, framework structure and material selection, and “literary life History ”intervention, after all, a choice of literary history writing paradigm. As a kind of literary history, the proposition of “literary life history” proposition and its paradigm shift include at least three independent and integrated levels: one is the subjective choice centered on ordinary readers; the other is based on daily Life-based value judgments, the third is based on the social reaction as a reference to the dynamic description, so as to achieve “dialogue” literary history writing, and then re-establish the relationship between literature and life significance.