论文部分内容阅读
所谓公理,就是经过人们长期实践检验的、不需要证明同时也无法去证明的客观规律,例如我们在初中平面几何开篇所学的“两点确定一条并且只有一条直线”“三点确定一个平面”等公理。正是在这些公理的基础上,建立起了平面几何这门学科。同样,在我们的GMAT改错中,也有一些规律(我们把这些总结出来的规律暂且称为“公理”),把握好了这些规律——即“公理”——会对我们答题速度和正确度有很大的帮助。然而,这些“公理”并不像平面几何的公理那样可以放之四海而皆准,也就是说,在使用它们时,不能保证100％正确。有时它们只能保证95％左右的正确性,剩下的5%左右可能需要综合考虑来确定最终答案。另外,GMAT改错题是对语言表达的有效性、简洁性、正确性的考核,它带有灵活性,而不像平面几何那样要求有严密的逻辑。下面就谈一下GMAT改错“公理”。
The so-called axioms are objective laws that have been tested by people for a long time and do not require proof and cannot be proved at the same time. For example, we learned in the beginning of junior high school plane geometry that “two points determine one and only one straight line” and “three points determine a plane”. And other axioms. It is on the basis of these axioms that the discipline of plane geometry has been established. In the same way, in our GMAT corrections, there are also some laws (we temporarily call these summed-up laws “axioms”), and we grasp these laws—that is, “axioms”—that will answer the speed and accuracy of our answer. Great help. However, these “axioms” are not as universal as the axioms of plane geometry. That is to say, when using them, they cannot be guaranteed to be 100% correct. Sometimes they can only guarantee about 95% accuracy, and the remaining 5% may need comprehensive consideration to determine the final answer. In addition, the GMAT correction problem is an assessment of the validity, conciseness, and correctness of language expression. It has flexibility and does not require strict logic like plane geometry. Let’s talk about GMAT error correction “Axioms”.