肇始于20世纪80年代末的新沃尔夫主义给陷入低谷的语言迁移研究注入了新的思想源泉。即时思维假说和概念迁移假说均是受新沃尔夫主义启迪而先后提出的语言迁移学说。本文在简要阐释了两个假说理论内涵的基础之上,重点从理论来源、理论范畴、研究方法和研究发展等方面对二者进行比较和评介。前者所持观点偏于保守谨慎,但就研究而言可操作性较强,已经成为二语习得研究的一个范式;后者把社会文化因素纳入对语言与思维关系的考察,同时把语言与文化对思维的影响扩展到整体认知层面,理论框架更为宽泛,但是尚需更多研究的验证,具有很大的发展潜力。两个假说均从思维对语言的影响视角来解读语言迁移,值得国内学界研究借鉴。 The new Wolffianism, which originated in the late 1980s, infused a new source of thought into the study of language transition into depression. Both the immediate thinking hypothesis and the concept transfer hypothesis are the linguistic transfer doctrines that have been inspired by Neo-Wolf’s doctrine. Based on the brief explanation of the connotation of the two hypothesis theories, this article mainly compares and comments on the two theories from the aspects of theoretical sources, theoretical categories, research methods and research development. The former holds a conservative and cautious view, but its operability is strong in terms of research. It has become a paradigm for second language acquisition studies. The latter incorporates socio-cultural factors into the study of the relationship between language and thinking, while integrating language and culture The impact of thinking extends to the overall cognitive level, the theoretical framework is more broad, but still need more research verification, has great potential for development. Both of the two hypotheses interpret the language transfer from the perspective of the influence of thinking on language, which is worth learning from the domestic academic circles.