本文依据多种版本的东京审判庭审速记,证明国民政府军政部次长秦德纯到庭作证并不只是空言无据。只要涉及秦德纯所辖防区及部下人与事,无论简单还是复杂,秦之思路清晰,回答准确,其表现亦可圈可点。而在回答日军演习权所涉国际条约暨《辛丑条约》时,则言语失当,进退无据。这是因为,对于东京审判,国民政府所持为“惩罚”的思路,而不是“审判”的思路。秦德纯对于《辛丑条约》的内容相当陌生,成为日方辩护律师质证之要点。直到今天,民族主义与国际条约,依然是中日两国学者关于抗日战争史之研究之分歧所在。 This article based on a variety of versions of Tokyo trial court trial of speed, proved that the KMT Minister of Defense Minister Qin Dechun testifying in court is not just empty talk. As long as the area under the jurisdiction of Qin Dechun and subordinates and people involved, whether simple or complicated, Qin clear thinking, accurate answer, its performance is remarkable. When answering the international treaty concerning the exercise of the right of the Japanese military and the “Xinchu Treaty,” the language was improperly retreated. This is because, for the Tokyo trial, the national government held the idea of ​​“punishing” rather than “trying”. Qin Dechun is quite unfamiliar with the contents of the “Xinchuu treaty,” and has become the point of proof of the Japanese defense lawyers. Until today, nationalism and international treaties are still the differences between the scholars of China and Japan in the study of the history of the Anti-Japanese War.