论文部分内容阅读
我国现行法律规定当事人应当申请作出保全裁定的审判机构对裁定进行执行,对于拒不履行的被申请人,可以采用妨害民事诉讼的强制措施。本文认为,诉讼保全的裁定应当直接交付执行机构执行,既无需当事人提出执行申请,也不宜由作出裁定的审判机构执行。立法对行为义务缺乏有效执行措施是导致行为义务“执行难”问题的主要原因。强制措施的适用并不能真正保障行为义务的实现。欲想在制度上解决此问题,关键在于对间接执行方式的承认。
The current law of our country requires the parties involved to apply for the execution of the ruling by the adjudication body that made the preservation decision, and the compulsory measures that may hinder the civil lawsuit may be taken against the respondent who refuses to perform. This article argues that the lawsuit should be delivered directly to the enforcement agency for enforcement, either without the parties’ application for enforcement and not by the adjudication authority. The lack of effective implementation of the legislative obligation on behavior is the main reason for the “difficult implementation” of obligations of conduct. The application of coercive measures does not really guarantee the realization of the obligation of conduct. The key to resolving this issue systematically lies in the recognition of the indirect implementation.