科学真理应当欢迎公众评议技术出口必须遵守国家规定——对“顾氏循环”的讨论

来源 :制冷技术 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:cuileidan
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
笔者于4月3日在上海科学会堂参加《顾氏循环学术讨论会》,“顾氏循环”技术持有人顾雏军也出席了会议。笔者虽曾阅读顾氏二篇文章,即“一个新型热力循环的研究”和“G 制冷循环的研究”,但感到概念模糊、逻辑混乱,系统复杂,实现困难。笔者唯恐理解有误,迫切希望顾氏发表更多的文章详细阐述,迫切希望顾氏本人能在会上畅述其循环及参数,超多元非共沸混合工质热物理特性等问题,对学术界存在的众多疑问作出明确的分析和解释,以便使到会学者心服口服,从疑虑转为支持,并积极推广。 On April 3, the author attended “Gu's Cycle Symposium” in Shanghai Science Hall and Gu Chujun, the technical holder of “Gu's Cycle”, attended the meeting. Although I once read Gu's two articles, namely “a new type of thermodynamic cycle study” and “the study of refrigeration cycle G”, I felt ambiguous in concept, confused in logic, complicated in system and difficult in realization. I fear fear of misunderstanding, I urge Gu Gu published more articles elaborate, I urge Gu Gu himself at the meeting to describe its cycle and parameters, multi-multivariate non-azeotropic mixture of thermophysical properties and other issues, the academic Many questions exist in the community to make a clear analysis and interpretation in order to enable the scholars to be convinced, from doubt to support, and actively promote.
其他文献
本文主要是注意到在传统的马克思主义哲学的研究成果的叙事中,学者所普遍采用的“六经注我”方式,即首先提出本身观点,并随后在马克思主义的经典文本中寻求理论依据,以这样一