论文部分内容阅读
社会科学研究的学术评价能否公正、客观、科学,既是中国人文社会科学研究项目管理的一个难点问题,也是中国人文社会科学界近20年来一直讨论和争论的热点问题,同时,它也是国际学术界同行共同面对的问题。本文从总体论述中国社会科学研究项目资助体系、资助与评估基本模式和项目管理主要特点;重点回顾中国社会科学20世纪90年代中后期对研究项目评估方式的研究和探索以及产生的影响;分析和阐述新世纪以来研究项目学术评价新的发展趋势,以及需要积极应对的若干新问题。论文力图展示中国社会科学界在研究项目资助与评估方式上不断研究、不断探索的历史过程。
Whether the academic evaluation of social science research is just, objective and scientific is not only a difficult issue for the management of Chinese humanities and social sciences research projects, but also a hot issue that has been discussed and debated in China’s humanities and social sciences for nearly 20 years. At the same time, it is also an international academic Community peers face the problem. This article mainly discusses the funding system of Chinese social science research projects, the basic modes of funding and evaluation and the main features of project management. It mainly reviews the research and exploration on the evaluation methods of research projects in China’s social sciences in the mid-to-late 1990s and their impacts. It elaborates the new development trend of academic evaluation of research projects since the new century and some new problems that need to be actively dealt with. The dissertation attempts to demonstrate the historical process of continuous research and continuous exploration by Chinese social science community in the research funding and evaluation methods.