论文部分内容阅读
目的分析非脱垂子宫阴式切除术的特点。方法将医院收治的50例患有非脱垂子宫性疾病患者随机分为试验组和对照组各25例。试验组患者采用非脱垂子宫阴式切除术进行治疗;对照组患者进行常规切除术治疗。比较2组患者在术中的出血量、手术时间和住院时间。结果试验组术中出血量小于对照组,住院时间短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于非脱垂子宫性疾病患者,采用阴式切除术优于常规手术,值得在临床上广泛应用。
Objective To analyze the characteristics of non-prolapsed uterine vaginosis. Methods Fifty patients with non-prolapsed uterine diseases admitted to the hospital were randomly divided into experimental group and control group with 25 cases each. Patients in the test group were treated with non-prolapsed uterine vaginal resection; patients in the control group were treated with conventional resection. The amount of bleeding, operation time and hospital stay in the two groups were compared. Results The blood loss in the experimental group was less than that in the control group, and the length of hospital stay was shorter than that in the control group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion For patients with non-prolapsed uterine diseases, vaginal resection is superior to conventional surgery, it is worth widely used in clinical practice.