万斯同主编明史,史称其稿为王鸿绪所攘窃,八十年代,史学界曾对此进行探讨,并涉及对其史学思想的评价。然迄今为止,尚未发现万氏亲笔的《明史稿》手稿,故各种意见,皆未能得出最终结论。笔者曾有幸查阅了今藏宁波市天一阁的《明史稿》(一名《明史列传稿》),考定半为万氏亲笔,半经万氏修改。由于客观条件所限,未能对此稿本作全面深入的研究,仅为初考,希冀能抛砖引玉,请史学界同仁多加指正。 Vance with the chief editor Ming Shi, history known as the draft for the burglary by Wang Hongxu, the eighties, historians have discussed it, and involves the evaluation of its historical thought. However, up till now, no Wanming’s “Manuscript of the History of Ming Dynasty” manuscript has been found yet, so various opinions have failed to reach the final conclusion. I had the privilege of access to today’s possession of Tianyi Pavilion in Ningbo City, “the Ming Dynasty draft” (a “Mingshi column biography”), test half Wan million handwriting, Wanwan by Wan revision. Due to the objective conditions, it is impossible to make a comprehensive and in-depth study on this manuscript, just for the first time, hoping to start a discussion with scholars and historians.