读过《三字经》的人,无不知晓“养不教,父之过”这一千古传诵的警句。改革开放之后,有的地方出现了《新编三字经》,将其中的“养不教,父之过”改为“养不教,亲之过”。这一改动就更为贴切了,因为教育孩子,不光是做父亲的责任,孩子的母亲以及其他监护人都有这个义务和责任。但是,在过去法制不健全的情况下,“父之过”也好,“亲之过”也罢,都只能是一句空话,充其量不过是一句人们的口头禅,或者作为一种道德谴责的时髦用语而 Have read the “Three Character Classic” who are all aware of “raising or not teaching, the father had” the ancient epoch-making aphorism. After the reform and opening up, “new three-character scriptures” appeared in some places and replaced the phrase “raising one without religion and father one’s past” with “keeping one’s religion and teaching one another”. This change is even more relevant, because educating children is not only the responsibility of the father, but also the child’s mother and other guardians have this obligation and responsibility. However, in the past when the legal system was not sound, neither the “father too” nor the “pro-parent” could only be an empty talk. At best, it was merely a mantra of people or a fashionable term of moral condemnation and