论文部分内容阅读
一、研究史 1975年《辽宁鸽子洞旧石器遗址发掘报告》发表(以下筒称《发掘报告》)。这份报告是1973年的调查报告,报告介绍了遗址概况、出土动物化石、主要石器等,同时还提出了以下观点。 (1)石器是用锤击法剥离石片并进行二次加工。石器以刮削器为主,但缺乏相对稳定形状。结论为:鸽子洞石器具有一定原始性,与周口店第1地点上部,第15地点和山西省南海峪的石器极其相似。而与丁村和国内旧石器时代晚期石器群有很大差别,在文化上与北京猿人文化最为密切,是北京猿人文化的发展分布范围的扩大。(2)
First, the history of research 1975 “Liaoning pigeon cave Paleolithic site excavation report” published (hereinafter referred to as “excavation report”). This report is a 1973 survey, which contains an overview of the site, animal fossils, and the main stone tools. The following points were also raised. (1) The stone is stripped of stone by hammering and secondary processing. Stone-based scrapers, but the lack of a relatively stable shape. The conclusion is: Pigeon travertine has a certain degree of primitiveness, which is very similar to the upper part of No. 1 spot of Zhoukoudian, No. 15 spot and the stoneware of Nanhaiyu of Shanxi Province. However, there is a great difference between Dingcun and the later Paleolithic group in China. It is culturally most closely related to Beijing’s ape-man culture and is an extension of the development and distribution of Beijing’s ape-human culture. (2)