论文部分内容阅读
鉴定结论是鉴定人利用自己的专门知识或经验对案件事实或其他证据的解读,在保证鉴定结论准确性的三条进路中,提升质证质量不失为较佳的路径依赖。对鉴定结论的质证应当在当事人以及诉讼代理人参加的诉讼环境中引入专家辅助人和专家陪审员的参与机制,通过形成专家陪审员、专家辅助人和鉴定人三维构造的庭审质证模式使鉴定结论质量得到提升,从而保证借助鉴定结论认定事实的准确性。
The appraisal conclusion is that the appraiser interprets the fact or other evidence of the case by using his or her own expertise or experience. In the three approaches of ensuring the accuracy of the appraisal conclusion, it is a better path dependence to enhance the quality of the attestation. The certification of the conclusion of the appraisal should include the participation mechanism of expert assistants and expert jurors in the litigation environment in which the parties and the litigation representatives participate. Through the examination and verification mode of three-dimensional structure formed by expert jurors, expert assistants and appraisers, the quality of appraisal conclusions Be promoted, so as to ensure the accuracy of the fact by means of the conclusion of the appraisal.