本文的目的不在于跟着世界４４名回答者后面，继续回答西蒙及其“忧伤的故事”对有忏悔之心的纳粹罪人与罪行的指问：“宽恕”还是“不宽恕”？而是改变方向，溯源追问，造成纳粹式罪人与罪行的“生存论原因”如今是否不存在了？如果不仅存在，而且更理想地精致了其政治哲学—神学的合法性根据，为诸神之一神张目，那么，仅仅问战争罪行后果的宽恕与否，于事何补？ The purpose of this article is not to follow behind the 44 respondents in the world and to continue answering questions from Simon and his “sad story” about the Nazi sinner and crime with repentance: “forgiveness” or “forgiveness”? But instead of “changing the direction, tracing the questioning and asking,” the “existential reasons” that caused the Nazi sinners and crimes now do not exist? If not only exists but also exaggerates its political philosophy, the legitimacy basis of theology, ideally for one of the gods, then merely asking forgiveness or not of the consequences of the war crimes is what makes up?