在社会主义市场经济确立以来,人民的生活,物质文化水平不断提高,网络资讯发达,以互联网为载体的网络舆论正冲击着社会政治、经济、文化、道德、宗教等各个方面,网络舆论所代表的民意、思潮、价值评价和监督,对法院审判工作和裁判结果的影响越来越大,法院和法官的工作稍有不慎,都可能以始料未及的新闻点吸引大众的眼球,并瞬间传遍国内外,成为热议的话题。由于网络的普及与网络媒体所具有的开放性及互动性,使得现如今许多民众认为相对于传统媒体而言,在网络媒体上更能有效地表达自己观点和诉求,这也使得民众参与网络舆论的热情普遍高涨,网络舆论的形成和反映也呈现出了与传统媒体所不同的特点。从正面来说,网络舆论往往反映的是底层民众的声音,由于政府的决策和行为最终也将作用于底层民众,所以这种源于民间的舆论监督有利于民众客观地对各级政府施行有效的舆论监督,以及表达自己的合理诉求。但从反面来说,由于网民的身份是隐匿的,名字是虚拟的,道德与法律在网络上难以起到有效的约束作用,网络上常出现一些针对政府的非理性的谩骂与攻击,甚至是刻意散布虚假信息或谣言以图制造混乱的情况,从而给正常的社会秩序带来不良影响。如何正确认识和对待网络舆论,是司法机关需要面对的一个重要问题。文章主要以网络舆论对法院公信力的影响,通过对法院本身问题出发,举例大量相关事实,进行详细的剖析,对相关事件的发生及其原因提出了自己的看法,提出相关问题,通过讨论找出相应措施,对我国法院提高司法公信力提出了几点做法,及相关的应对方法作出讨论。 Since the establishment of the socialist market economy, the people’s life, material and cultural standards have been continuously improved. The network information is well developed. The internet-based media with Internet as its carrier has been attacking various aspects of social politics, economy, culture, ethics and religion. Of opinion, ideological trend, value evaluation and supervision have an increasing impact on the court trial work and the adjudication result, and the work of courts and judges is a little careless, which may attract public attention with unforeseen news points. An instant spread throughout the country, became a hot topic. Due to the popularity of the Internet and the openness and interaction of the online media, many people nowadays think that they can express their opinions and appeals more effectively on the online media than the traditional media, which also makes the public participate in the online media The enthusiasm of the public is generally high, and the formation and reflection of online public opinion also show different characteristics from the traditional media. On the positive side, the online public opinion often reflects the voice of the bottom people. Since the government’s decision-making and behavior will eventually also affect the people at the bottom, this public opinion supervision from the private sector will help the public to effectively implement the government at all levels of government objectively Public opinion supervision, as well as to express their reasonable demands. On the contrary, however, since the identities of Internet users are hidden and their names are virtual, it is difficult for morality and law to act as an effective constraint on the Internet. Some irrational verbal abuse and attacks against the government often occur on the Internet, and even Deliberately disseminating false information or rumors in an attempt to create chaos, thereby adversely affecting the normal social order. How to correctly understand and treat online public opinions is an important issue that the judiciary needs to face. The article mainly analyzes the impact of internet opinion on the credibility of the court. By analyzing a large number of relevant facts, this article analyzes in detail the relevant facts and puts forward their own views on the occurrence of the related events and their causes. Corresponding measures to our court to improve the credibility of the judiciary put forward several practices, and related coping methods to be discussed.