论文部分内容阅读
十八屆四中全會在‘保障人民群衆參與司法’、‘健全依法維權和化解糾紛機制’、‘加強法律服務隊伍建設’方面都提到了調解工作。‘調解’看似簡單,實質上卻蘊涵著特定的政治文化觀念乃至哲學思想,對於人性、糾紛和社會的本質都有著不同的看法。儘管中西方都存在著衆多‘調解’實踐,但是它們內部卻分化多元,不同模式的調解之間也有著深刻的差異。通過比較的方法,可以充分揭示它們的實質內涵。
The Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee referred to the mediation work in such fields as ’protecting the people’s participation in the judiciary,’ “perfecting the system of safeguarding the rights according to law and settling disputes,” and “strengthening the legal service team building.” Seemingly simple, “mediation” actually contains certain political and cultural concepts as well as philosophical thinking, and all have different views on human nature, disputes and the nature of society. Although there are many “mediation” practices in both China and the West, there are many divergences within them and profound differences between different modes of mediation. By comparison, they can fully reveal their substance.