论文部分内容阅读
本文以为,“X+胜+Y”和“X+败+Y”句法结构中的“胜”和“败”与其转换式“X+胜”和“Y+败”中的“胜”和“败”具有不同的配价功能,分别是“胜_1”与“胜_2”、“败、”与“败_2”。其词义所描写的基体、突显的侧面及其包含的实体、实体与动词的语义关系等因素,不但制约着它们所联系的论元,而且也制约着它们所生成的句法结构及其转换形式,同时也导致了“胜_1”和“败_1”所生成的主述宾结构在主宾语相同的条件下,能够表述出基本相同的语义。
This paper holds that the “wins” and “defeats” in the syntactic structure of “X + wins + Y” and “X + defeats + Y” are different from the “wins” and “defeats” in the transitive “X + wins” and “Y + defeats” The price function, namely “wins _1” and “wins _2”, “defeat” and “defeat _2”. The semantics of the matrix, the highlighted side and the entities it contains and the semantic relationship between the entity and the verb in the semantic meaning not only restrict the argument elements they link, but also restrict the syntactic structure and the transformation forms they generate, At the same time, it also leads that the main prophet structure generated by “wins_1” and “loser_1” can express the same semantics under the condition that the main object is the same.