从问卷调查统计的初步分析来看,中国民主党派精英参与公共政策制定的特征主要是:对公共政策制定过程的关注度明显高于普通民众;参与动机以公利导向为主;获取政策信息的主渠道更丰富,使用频率更均衡,信息技术更现代;对不同层级政策的关心程度和参与程度之间存在明显的剪刀差现象;参与频次在横向分布上存在非均衡状况;在绝大部分政策领域,民主党派的参与频次达到甚至超过了党派精英的期望值,但在反腐倡廉、政法领域,党派精英对民主党派参与频次的认知与期望程度有较大差距;不同党派的精英表达出来的对本党派政策参与领域的偏好不一样,这种偏好往往受到民主党派作为政党所具有的利益代表功能与作为知识分子政党所具有的社会责任感、忧患意识和大众情怀的影响;更倾向于使用组织化、理性化、制度化的方式参与公共政策制定;更倾向于利用制度性途径表达政策建议;参与绩效明显高于一般民众。 According to the preliminary analysis of the questionnaire statistics, the main characteristics of elite participation in public policy making in China are as follows: the attention to the process of public policy making is obviously higher than that of the general public; the motivation is dominated by public interest; the main beneficiary of policy information More abundant channels, more balanced use and more modern information technology. There is a clear scissors difference between the level of care and participation in different levels of policy. There is imbalance in the horizontal distribution of frequency of participation. In most policy areas, The participation frequency of the democratic parties reaches or even surpasses the expectation of the elite of the party. However, there is a wide gap between the recognition and expectation of the participation of the elite in the field of fighting corruption, promoting the integrity of the political system and the political parties. The elites of different parties have expressed their opposition to the party The preferences in the field of policy participation are not the same. Such preferences are often influenced by the function of interest represented by the democratic parties as political parties and the social responsibility, the sense of urgency and the general feelings of the intellectuals as parties; the more inclined to use the organizational and rational Participate in public policy making in a systematic and institutionalized way; prefer more Use institutional approaches to express policy advice; participation performance was significantly higher than the general public.