论文部分内容阅读
社区调解的现有问题有两个方面,其一,优秀的民间调解机构过分依赖个人能力,不具有推广性;其二,社区调解地区发展不平衡,存在社区调解能力缺乏的地域。针对这些问题,须探寻扩展社区调解机制的影响力并能使之真正具有功效的方式。社区调解的可接受性塑造,主要依托信任机制的建立。探寻信任基础,即社区调解机构自身的权威性,本文从纵横两个方面入手,纵向研究中国历史上的民间调解的权威来源;横向分析全国各地的现有成功的调解工作室的经验和利弊,探究现代调解的威权性来源。因此,需要建立法理型权威模式。调解中的权利保护的本质即是保护程序正义,保证在调解工作的完整实现。社区调解的权威性基础即是保证调解的程序正义,以达成可信性和可取性两个要求。
There are two aspects to the existing problems of community mediation. First, outstanding civil mediators rely too much on their own abilities and are not promoted. Second, the development of community mediation is unbalanced and there is a lack of community mediation capability. Addressing these issues, one must explore ways to expand the influence of community mediation mechanisms and make them truly effective. The formation of acceptability of community mediation depends mainly on the establishment of trust mechanism. To explore the foundation of trust, that is, the authority of community mediation institutions, this paper starts from both vertical and horizontal perspectives and studies the authoritative sources of civil mediation in Chinese history in a vertical way. It also analyzes the experience, advantages and disadvantages of the existing successful mediation studios all over the country, Exploring the Source of Authoritarianism in Modern Mediation. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a jurisprudence-based authority model. The essence of the right protection in conciliation is to protect the procedural justice and ensure the complete realization of the conciliation work. The authoritative basis of community mediation is to guarantee the procedural justice of mediation so as to achieve the two requirements of credibility and desirability.