论文部分内容阅读
目的对医学检验领域比较典型的能力验证计划进行比较,使医学检验实验室维持较高的水平。方法参考《能力验证提供者认可准则》中对能力验证提供者的要求,对能力评估中的主要环节与要素进行分析。分析室间质量评价的主要组织者对指定值、分组原则、评价标准、能力统计量等的比较情况。于2015年5月选择评价机构室间质评汇总表中的10个项目展开分析。结果 4个主要的空间质量评价组织者的分析项目和评估的结果由于其不同的法律框架、质量管理体系而出现了一定的差异,体现出了各自的特色。但是4个主要的组织者的评价标准基本一致。结论能力验证的组织者所提供的价值参数在其使用范围内均具有良好的参考价值,对于医学检验领域质量水平的提升具有重要意义。
Objective To compare the typical proficiency testing schemes in the field of medical testing so that the medical laboratory can maintain a high level. Methods With reference to the requirements of proficiency testing providers in the Criteria for Certification of Proficiency Testing Providers, the main links and elements of proficiency testing are analyzed. Analysis of the main organizers of inter-office quality evaluation of the specified value, grouping principles, evaluation criteria, capacity statistics, etc. comparison. In May 2015, we selected 10 items in the inter-office quality evaluation summary table of the evaluation agency to conduct an analysis. Results The results of the analysis and assessment of the four main spatial quality evaluation organizers showed some differences due to their different legal frameworks and quality management systems, which reflected their own characteristics. However, the evaluation criteria of the four major organizers are basically the same. Conclusions The value parameters provided by the organizer of proficiency testing have good reference value within the scope of its use, and are of great significance for improving the quality of medical examinations.