私法自治或意思自治并非民法追求的唯一目标。民法所关心的毋宁是多种价值的协调共存。同时,法律效果来源于法律规范这一事实与私法自治并没有必然的冲突,相反,法律规范往往是私法自治的保障。哲学诠释学有特定的理论预设和论证目标,它对民法学的意义在于其提供了一种思考问题的立场和反思能力,而不是方法论。因此,用游戏概念来阐述意思表示的解释过程并没有规范性的内容,也不能更好地促进私法自治。 Private law autonomy or autonomy of will is not the sole goal pursued by civil law. Civil law is concerned rather than the harmonious coexistence of multiple values. At the same time, there is no necessary conflict between the fact that the legal effect comes from legal norms and the autonomy of private law. On the contrary, legal norms are often the guarantee of the autonomy of private law. Philosophical hermeneutics has a specific theoretical presupposition and argumentation objective. Its significance to civil law science lies in its providing a position for thinking and rethinking, not methodology. Therefore, there is no normative content in explaining the explanation process of meaning expression by the concept of game, nor can it better promote the autonomy of private law.