论文部分内容阅读
大连市民杨殿庆给电台“市民心”热线直播节目打电话,说他到一家大酒店吃饭被多收了钱,诉之物价所,物价所决定处罚该酒店5000元,然而一位官员出面干预了,这个处罚决定没有执行。他在电话中提到了那位官员的姓和官职,被后者以侵犯名誉权告上法庭,法院判赔6000元精神损失。 现在,杨殿庆的官司二审也输了。 这个“给电台打电话的官司”,使我想起前英国上诉法院院长丹宁勋爵在《法律的未来》一书介绍的一个“给报纸写信的官司”——《斯利姆诉每日电讯报案》。 “这个案子是关于在泰晤士河边的哈默史密斯修一条道路的争论问题。公民有走路的权利。地方议会贴出一张‘禁止通行’的通告。该通告是市政官斯利姆先生签署的。以后斯利姆
Dalian resident Yang Dianqing called the “Citizens’ Hotline” on the live broadcast of the hotline and said that he was overcharged for dinner at a large hotel. He claimed that the price of the hotel would be 5,000 yuan for the price. However, an official intervened, This penalty decision is not implemented. He mentioned on the phone the officer’s last name and official post, which was sued by the latter for infringement of reputation, the court awarded a mental reward of 6,000 yuan. Now, the second trial of Yang Dianqing also lost. The “lawsuit calling the radio station” reminds me of a “lawsuit addressed to the newspaper,” introduced by Lord Denning, former head of the British Court of Appeal, in The Future of Law, “Slim v. Daily Telecom reported. ” “This case is a controversial issue about repairing a road to Hammersmith by the River Thames. Citizens have the right to walk. The local council posted a notice of” No Access. "The circular was signed by Squire Municipality After Slim