论文部分内容阅读
一般的形而上学和特殊的形而上学的关系问题是在理解亚里士多德形而上学思想体系时长期面临的一个理论难题。弗雷德依据其老师帕奇克的思想,对这个问题做出了全面而详尽的解答。弗雷德深刻地分析了存在者和存在方式之间的差别,表明作为特殊的形而上学的神学不只关注一类特殊的存在者,而且还关注专属于这一类特殊的存在者的特殊的存在方式,而正是这类特殊的存在者的存在方式构成了一切存在者的核心的存在方式,其他存在者和其他存在方式只有依据这一首要的存在者的存在方式才能得到合理的和彻底的解释。由此,弗雷德就说明了神学作为特殊的形而上学,在研究专属于它的研究对象不可感实体的同时,如何能够同时也构成了普遍的形而上学,为一切存在者提供了终极的解释。
The relationship between general metaphysics and special metaphysics is a long-standing theoretical challenge in understanding the metaphysical system of Aristotle. According to his teacher Patch, Fred made a comprehensive and detailed answer to the question. Fred profoundly analyzed the differences between the being and the modes of being, suggesting that as a particular metaphysical theology not only focuses on a particular kind of being, but also on the special modes of existence that are specific to this particular kind of being , And it is precisely the existence of such special beings that constitutes the core of all beings, and the existence of other beings and other ways of existence can only be reasonably and thoroughly explained based on the existence of this chief beings . As a result, Fred shows that theology as a special metaphysics can not only study the non-sensory entities that belong to its research object, but also provide a universal metaphysics which provides the ultimate explanation for all.