论文部分内容阅读
“刑事附带民事责任”一词开始出现于学者论著和司法解释中,但其却有矮化民事责任法律地位、错判民事责任实践地位、助长刑事本位主义等重大弊端,是对法律渊源和责任来源的误读,不具有作为法律术语的科学性,是刑法迷信以及相关用语混乱的产物。“刑事损害赔偿责任”可避免上述弊端,是该词的良好替代;“附带民事判决”则可以用作其他具体场合的替代。
The term “criminal incidental civil liability ” began to appear in scholarly writings and judicial interpretations, but it has dwarfed the legal status of civil liability, misconducted the practical status of civil liability and contributed to major defects such as criminal self-righteousness. Misunderstanding of the source of responsibility and the lack of scientificity as a legal term are the products of the superstition of the criminal law and related chaos. “Criminal damages ” to avoid the above shortcomings is a good alternative to the term; “Incidental Civil Judgment ” can be used as a substitute for other specific occasions.