论文部分内容阅读
合同的相对性是合同的本质属性之一,近代以来以第三人利益合同为代表的涉他合同的出现对合同的这一属性提出了挑战。本文认为这并未从根本上动摇合同相对性的根基,只是对合同相对性的修正。本文简单梳理了第三人利益合同在立法上和理论上被肯定的过程。《合同法》第六十四条是否规定了第三人利益合同,是一个有争议的问题。本文认为该条规定没有明确规定第三人利益合同,但是也没有否定,从而为法律解释留下了空间。
The relative nature of the contract is one of the essential attributes of the contract. The emergence of the contract involving the third-party benefit contract in the modern era poses a challenge to this attribute of the contract. This paper argues that this does not fundamentally shake the foundation of the contract relativity, but the amendment of the relative nature of the contract. This article simply sorts out the process of the third party’s benefit contract being approved in both the legislation and theory. Whether Article 63 of the Contract Law stipulates the third-party benefit contract is a controversial issue. This article argues that the article stipulates that there is no explicit stipulation of the third-party benefit contract, but it also does not deny it, thus leaving room for legal interpretation.