李健生同志以《“引文分析法”质疑》一文(文中称“李文”)对“引文法”从多种角度提出了批评,笔者以为,“李文”的一些观点所体现的思想是正确的,但不少结论却是错误的。“李文”在前言中将“引文法”和“文摘法”混为一谈,都作为“引文法”,这在出发点上就是错误的,因为这两种方法所包含的本质绝不相同。“文摘法”的含义实质上是反映的二次文献的文摘员对论文的粗略了解,以物质产品比拟,文摘员只是“批发公司的采购员”,而不是最终用户,做文摘的目的仍是为了方便“最终用户” Comrade Li Jiansheng criticized the “Citation Law” from a variety of perspectives in the article entitled “Citing Papers on” (Wen Wen, “Li Wen”). The author believes that some of Li Wen’s views reflect the correct thinking However, many conclusions are wrong. In his preface, Li Wen confused the Citation Act and the Digest Act as “citation laws,” which is wrong from the point of departure because the nature of these two approaches is no different. The meaning of Abstracts Act essentially reflects the rough understanding of the dissertation by the secondary literature abstractist. Compared with material products, abstracts are only “the buyer of the wholesale company”, not the end user, and the purpose of abstracts is still In order to facilitate “end user”