论文部分内容阅读
集团仲裁有解决群体性纠纷的优势,因此受到美国重视并为其他国家借鉴。但是目前集团仲裁制度并不完善,通过系统的研究集团仲裁与传统双边仲裁不同而引起的质疑,以及在程序的启动和承认与执行时所面临的障碍,能够更深入地探究集团仲裁制度,为我国将来借鉴集团仲裁的益处,解决群体性纠纷做出贡献。我国在所有纠纷领域全面引入集团仲裁制度是不切实际的,可以首先在消费者群体性纠纷领域借鉴集团仲裁制度,而且仲裁机构可以参考美国仲裁协会(AAA)的《集团仲裁补充规则》制定适合我国仲裁机构的集团仲裁规则。
Group arbitration has the advantage of resolving group disputes, so by the United States attention and for other countries to learn. However, the current system of group arbitration is not perfect. The systematic investigation of group arbitration and traditional bilateral arbitration can cause questions as well as barriers to start-up, recognition and enforcement of the proceedings, so as to explore the group arbitration system in more depth. In the future, our country will draw lessons from the benefits of group arbitration and make contributions to solving mass disputes. It is impractical for our country to introduce the group arbitration system in all disputes. It can draw lessons from the group arbitration system in the field of consumer disputes first, and the arbitration institution can make reference to the Supplementary Rules of the Group Arbitration Association of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) Group Arbitration Rules of China’s Arbitration Institutions.