论文部分内容阅读
虽然我国商标法并未明确规定“权利用尽”规则,但是其作为一项重要的商标权限制制度,无论是在市场流通领域,还是商标侵权判定中均有重要意义。在侵犯商标权纠纷中,若被控侵权人能够证明其所售商品来自于商标权人或被许可人,且其商业宣传及营销方式符合市场运行的基本规则,并未对注册商标的商誉产生负面、消极的影响,亦未导致相关公众对商品来源产生混淆,在此情形下,被控侵权人的相关行为不应认定构成侵害商标权。
Although China’s Trademark Law does not explicitly stipulate the “exhaustion of rights ” rules, but as an important system of trademark restrictions, both in the field of market circulation and trademark infringement are important decisions. In the dispute over trademark infringement, if the accused infringer can prove that the goods he sells come from the trademark owner or the licensee, and the methods of commercial promotion and marketing conform to the basic rules of market operation, the goodwill of the registered trademark Negative or negative impact, nor did it lead to any confusion among the public concerned about the source of the goods. In this case, the alleged infringer’s related act should not be deemed to constitute an infringement of trademark rights.