论文部分内容阅读
在实证法学立场上,人们的研究兴趣必定固守于诸如“法律是什么”、“法律的本质是什么”等问题。而法律诠释学关注的是法律与事实之间的互动关系,“如何理解法律的本质”这一问题成为人们的研究热点,法学研究应当关注主体性因素的作用。在国家制定法是司法裁判之唯一正当理由的基础上,实证法学坚持分析性真理观,强调从法律规则到司法结论的演绎式逻辑关系;法律诠释学在真理观上坚持融贯性立场,认为司法结论的正当性是由多个理由共同构成的整体所保证的,多个理由之间的融贯支持关系为结论提供正当性保证。融贯论的真理多元立场较为适合现代社会多元价值观念的需要,因而具有一定的积极意义。
In the position of positive jurisprudence, people’s research interests must be stuck to questions such as “What is law ” and “What is the essence of law ”. Legal hermeneutics focuses on the interactive relationship between law and fact, and the question of how to understand the nature of law has become a hot research topic. Law research should focus on the role of subjectivity. On the basis of the fact that state law is the only valid reason of judicial adjudication, positive jurisprudence adheres to the view of analytical truth, emphasizes the deductive logical relationship from legal rules to judicial conclusion, and legal hermeneutics sticks to the coherence position on the truth, The legitimacy of the judicial conclusion is guaranteed by the whole as a whole composed of multiple reasons, and the coherent support relationship between multiple reasons provides a justification for the conclusion. The pluralist truth of cohesion theory is more suitable for the needs of pluralistic values in modern society and therefore has some positive meanings.