目的:采用情绪Stroop范式考查不同愤怒特质者在情绪词刺激下的注意偏向差异。方法:问卷调查法筛选高、低特质怒者,完成情绪词Stroop任务。采集被试行为数据和脑电数据,分析被试在不同刺激下行为学及脑电潜伏期、波幅的差异。结果:行为学结果中,两组被试者反应时及反应正确率均无统计学差异。脑电结果中,高特质怒者的N2成分平均波幅大于低特质怒者(P<0.05),但P3成分无统计学差异。结论:对于不同愤怒特质者而言,其对冲突监控的脑激活程度存在显著差异,高特质怒者面对情绪相关刺激时投入的认知监控资源更多,更容易受到愤怒相关情绪的干扰。 Aims: To investigate the differences in attentional bias induced by emotional words under the emotional Stroop paradigm. Methods: Questionnaire screening of high and low character anger, completed the emotional word Stroop task. The participants were collected behavioral data and EEG data, the subjects were analyzed under different stimuli behavior and EEG latency, amplitude differences. Results: In the behavioral results, there was no significant difference between the two groups when they responded and the correct rate of response. In the EEG results, the average amplitude of N2 component of high-quality anger was greater than that of low-profile anger (P <0.05), but there was no significant difference in P3 content. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant difference in brain activation for conflict monitoring among those with different anger traits. High trait fury puts more resources for cognitive monitoring in the face of emotion-related stimuli and is more likely to be disturbed by emotion related to anger.