德国联邦宪法法院关于宪法基本权利对国际私法之效力的判例译评

来源 :中德法学论坛 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:ymlazy61
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
国际私法并非纯粹的中立性规定,其本身即具有价值判断的意义;国际私法的制订和适用均须受到宪法基本权利的约束;德国国际私法理论和私法实践均已认可基本权利对国际私法的影响力;基本权利通过两种途径影响国际私法,其一是国际私法规范本身要符合基本权利的规定,其二是宪法基本权利构成对《民法施行法》第6条所规定之公共秩序的具体内容,可以据此排除外国法在具体案件中的适用;在此过程中不适用公共秩序保留制度中的关联性原则和重大性原则。 Private international law is not a mere neutrality. It has the value of value judgments. The formulation and application of private international law must be bound by the basic constitutional rights. Both German private international law and private law practice have recognized the impact of fundamental rights on private international law The basic rights affect private international law in two ways. The first is that the norms of private international law are in conformity with the provisions of basic rights. The second is that constitutional fundamental rights constitute the specific contents of the public order stipulated in Article 6 of the Law on Enforcement of Civil Law , So that the application of foreign law in specific cases can be ruled out. In this process, the principle of relevance and the principle of materiality in the reservation system of public order are not applicable.
其他文献
禁止反言(estoppel)是依托衡平法上的公平正义理念发展起来的法律原则,指不允许一方当事人使用矛盾的行为或语言主张对另一方当事人的权利。禁止反言原则发轫于诉讼程序中的