论文部分内容阅读
作为对司法过程中价值因素予以较多关注的法律修辞方法,其本身修辞论证过程就是一种建立在语用学转向基础之上的说服性实践论辩。因为无论微观修辞技巧还是宏观修辞论证,都是一种语用型式的表达,论辩中的语用有效性是修辞说服的主要理论依据。这体现在两个方面:一是通过对语境的分析和把握拓展着有效性概念的理解,使对案件的分析由静态关注转向动态研究;二是主体间性共识的达成,保证判决得出作为“好论证”而具有更强的可接受性。
As a method of legal rhetoric which pays more attention to the value factors in judicial process, its own rhetorical argumentation process is a kind of persuasive practical argument based on the turning of pragmatics. Because both the micro-rhetorical skills and macroscopic rhetoric arguments are a pragmatic expression, the pragmatic validity of the argument is the main theoretical basis for rhetorical persuasion. This is reflected in two aspects: First, it expands the understanding of the concept of validity by analyzing and grasping the context so that the analysis of the case shifts from static concern to dynamic research; second, the conclusion of the inter-subjective consensus and the assurance judgment As a “good argument” and have a more acceptable.