论文部分内容阅读
蔡继明诉百度公司侵害名誉权、肖像权、姓名权、隐私权纠纷案被最高院认定为利用信息网络侵害公民人身权益的典型案例之一,其意义是对于界定网络服务商的责任范围提供了示例和指导。网络言论自由是计算机时代下公民言论自由的延伸,一方面使得公民的民意在一定程度上得到了更加充分、更加真实的表达,另一方面一些滥用言论自由的行为也造成了许多权利冲突。本文通过导入案件,探讨说明网络服务提供者的责任边界问题。
Cai Jiming v. Baidu Company infringement of reputation rights, portrait rights, name rights, privacy disputes was identified by the Supreme People’s Court as one of the typical cases of infringement of personal rights and interests of citizens by using information networks, the significance of which is to define the scope of responsibility for network service providers provides examples And guidance. The freedom of speech on the Internet is an extension of citizens’ freedom of speech under the computer age. On the one hand, citizen opinion has been given a fuller and more realistic expression to some extent. On the other hand, some abuses of freedom of speech have also caused many conflicts of rights. This article explores the issue of liability boundaries for ISPs by introducing cases.