论文部分内容阅读
关于公共艺术的公共性问题,已经在国内争论了十多年。近些年来,学术讨论产生了一些理论成果,在实践领域中也不能说没有进步,但无可回避的现实是:公共艺术的公共性在中国依然很成问题。鲁虹在十年前曾经一针见血地指出:严格意义上的“公共艺术”在中国并不存在。今天,这个断言在某种意义上仍然是适用的。究竟什么才是公共艺术?它遵循着什么样的逻辑?许多人同意哈贝马斯的意见:公共性只有在公民社会中才成为可能,它是一个政治协商空间,在那里,公众
The public issue of public art has been debated in the country for more than a decade. In recent years, there have been some theoretical achievements in academic discussions and no progress in the field of practice. However, the unavoidable reality is that the public nature of public art remains a problem in China. Lu Hong pointed out sharply ten years ago: In the strict sense, “public art” does not exist in China. Today, this assertion still applies in a sense. What exactly is public art? What logic does it follow? Many agree with Habermas’s argument that publicity is only possible in civil society and that it is a space for political consultation where the public