论文部分内容阅读
我国第一次在《合同法》第42、43和58条都针对缔约过失责任展开了详细描述和规定。然而,国家相关立法仅仅只是对缔约过失责任进行了一般规定,规范过于原则,且学者对缔约过失责任基本理论争议很大,这在一定程度上影响了权利人对权利的行使。本文通过缔约过失责任的构成要件进行分析,对缔约过失责任理论中的一些基本概念和情形进行了界定。
For the first time in our country, Articles 42, 43 and 58 of the “Contract Law” all set forth detailed descriptions and provisions on the fault liability of contracting parties. However, the relevant state legislation merely provides general provisions on fault liability of contracting parties and regulates the principle too much, and the scholars have great controversies over the basic theory of contracting negligence, which to a certain extent, affects the exercising of right by the proprietor. Through the analysis of the constitutional elements of contracting fault liability, this article defines some basic concepts and situations in contracting fault liability theory.