论文部分内容阅读
本文提出三个问题:一是明代中期第二次文学复古思潮的首创者是不是李攀龙?复古是为了反对王慎中、唐顺之的宗宋主张,反对江南靡弱文风和前七子追随者的模拟之风。是文风问题,无涉于政治。而在反对其时文风时,带着张扬、互相标榜、争名位的浓重色彩。二是李攀龙“文必秦、汉”主张,在创作践履上是泥古,并无成就。三是李攀龙“诗必汉魏、盛唐”的诗歌主张,在践履中并不成功。他的拟古乐府虽非句句模拟、篇篇模拟,但艺术上确实平庸。他不多的写得较好的诗,属于有真实感受、发抒真情之作,与复古并无必然之联系。
This paper raises three questions: First, the second pioneer of literary retro thought in the middle of the Ming Dynasty is not Li Panlong? Retro is to oppose Wang Shenzhong, Tang Shunzhi’s claims of the Song and Song, against the morale of Jiangnan and the imitation of the former seven followers wind. Is the style of writing, no politics. In opposition to the style of the time, with publicity, advertised each other, the name of bit thick place. Second, Li Panlong “Wen Qin Qin and Han ” claims that in the creative practice is mud ancient, there is no achievement. Third, Li Panlong “poetry will be Han, Wei Tang,” the poetic proposition, in practice is not successful. Although his ancient aristocratic Yuefu not sentence simulation, chapter simulation, but the art is indeed mediocre. His few well-written poems belong to the real feelings, to express the truth of the work, and the retro is not necessarily linked.