目前,学界对《侵权责任法》第五十六条的释义基本上仍停留在字面解释,造成实际工作中难以操作。医疗机构在紧急情况下虽然抢救了患者,但仍可能需要承担违约赔偿责任。尝试对该条款进行扩充和限制解释,指导医疗机构在不能获得患者和其近亲属知情同意时,能把握好使用这种医疗特权的尺度。 At present, the interpretation of Article 56 of the Tort Liability Act basically remains in the literal interpretation, which makes it difficult to operate in the actual work. Medical institutions may rescue the patient in an emergency, but may still be liable for breach of contract. Attempting to expand and restrict interpretation of this provision will guide medical institutions to take the measure of the use of such medical privilege in the absence of informed consent from patients and their close relatives.