论文部分内容阅读
柏拉图《王制》卷一中苏格拉底与智术师特拉绪马科斯关于正义定义的论辩,不仅在卷一、也在全书占有极为关键的地位,苏格拉底面临的来自智术师的这一重大挑战,实际上统领了全书关于正义及相关问题的讨论。但是,这场论辩理解起来并不容易。细致彻底地梳理这场论辩,既可以透辟揭示特拉绪马科斯的正义理解蕴含或潜藏的种种观念和立场,也可以清楚展示苏格拉底反驳特拉绪马科斯的诸种细节及其致胜的关键,还能指出进一步思考这场论争之思想史意义的可能方向。
The argument of the definition of justice by Socrates and the intellectuals, Traumax Marcos, in Plato’s “Monarchy” is not only in the first volume, but also in the entire possession of the critical position that Socrates is facing from the intellectuals A major challenge actually led the book’s discussion of justice and related issues. However, this argument is not easy to understand. This argument can be thoroughly and thoroughly explored, revealing not only all the concepts and positions contained in or implied in the sense of justice of Traus Marcos, but also the details of Socrates’ refutation of Traus Marcos and its success But also points out the possible direction for thinking further about the significance of the history of ideas in this debate.