论文部分内容阅读
被告人王江都、王天尖走私入境的102条窄吻鳄虽系《濒危野生动植物种国际贸易公约》附录Ⅰ中的物种,但我国现行立法并未明文规定走私窄吻鳄的定罪及量刑标准,相关司法解释中也无与窄吻鳄同属或者同科的珍贵动物可作为参照标准,控辩双方对能否以走私珍贵动物罪定罪及如何量刑争议极大。因此,如何准确把握立法精神,坚持罪刑相适应原则,能动地理解适用法律,解决好本案的定罪及量刑问题,对于今后审理日益呈高发态势的走私珍贵动物犯罪案件具有重要的指导意义。
Although the 102 alligators smuggled into China by the defendants Wang Jiangdu and Wang Tianying are the species in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, the current legislation in our country does not explicitly stipulate the conviction and sentencing of smuggling of alligators Nor is there any reference standard for the precious animals with the same or the same species as the alligators in the relevant judicial interpretations. Both the prosecution and the defense dispute on whether the crime of smuggling precious animals can be convicted or not and how the sentencing is extremely controversial. Therefore, how to accurately grasp the legislative spirit, adhere to the principle of adapting crime and punishment, understand the applicable law and solve the conviction and sentencing problems in this case is of great significance to the future trial of criminal cases of smuggling precious animals.